Lubricant Varnish
Lubricant varnish is a thin, insoluble film that deposits throughout the internal surfaces of a lubrication system. Varnish is a widespread problem in many sensitive lubrication applications, and comes in a wide range of colors and consistencies. The presence of varnish in hydraulic and lubrication systems cause serious and expensive problems.

Varnish formed on the Inlet Guide Vane
Valve of a Gas Turbine
Why does varnish seem to be a more noticeable contamination control problem then ever before?
Detection
Due to the potentially high costs associated with varnish, it is important for maintenance and reliability personnel to have a predictive tool to measure the lubricant's varnish potential. Determining the varnish potential of a fluid enables the user to investigate the root cause and implement corrective action before a catastrophic failure occurs. However, routine oil analysis fails to identify varnish potential. The following table lists some of the oil analysis tests that are currently performed and why they may not assist in determining varnish potential.
Analytical Test |
Method |
Typically Detects |
Limitations In Detecting Varnish |
Spectro Metals |
AA, RDE,
ICP, XRF |
Metallic wear particles. May also be used to measure metallic additive levels. |
Although metal particulates can act as a catalyst in lubricant degradation, the by-products responsible for varnish are non-metallic and therefore cannot be directly identified or measured by this method. |
Water ( % volume) |
KF, Crackle |
Water level. |
This test is useful for detecting conditions that may accelerate oil degradation, but cannot be used to directly measure varnish propensity. |
ISO Particle Count |
Automatic or Manual – ISO cleanliness rating |
Particles >5 microns in size. |
Degradation by-products are typically less than 1 micron size range. Conventional particle counting methods measure particles greater than 2-microns in size. While an excellent tool for monitoring larger “clearance sized” contaminants and filter efficiencies, this test is of limited use for measuring varnish contributing contaminants. |
Acid Number (AN) |
ASTM D644, D974 |
Acidic constituents. |
AN measures the lubricant’s acidic properties. This test is ineffective for measuring varnish potential, as varnish may occur well before an increase in acid number is observed. |
Rotating Pressure Vessel Oxidation Test (RPVOT) |
ASTM D2272 |
Oil’s resistance to oxidize under prescribed conditions. Can sometimes be correlated to levels of anti-oxidants. |
This test method is useful in measuring a lubricants remaining useful life. RPVOT cannot be used alone to measure the fluid’s varnish potential, as the oil still may have considerable useful life while simultaneously having a high varnish potential. |
Infrared |
FT-IR |
Molecular fingerprint. |
Although this test may be useful in determining the method of fluid degradation, FT-IR does not provide a quantifiable level of insolubles. |
Viscosity |
ASTM D445 |
Oil’s resistance to flow. |
A lubricant’s viscosity can increase from hydrocarbon chain polymerization. While a useful indicator that degradation is occurring, varnish propensity cannot be determined from changes in viscosity alone. |
Quantitative Spectrophotometric Analysis (QSASM)
Quantitative Spectrophotometric Analysis is a technique of purposely isolating and measuring the specific lubricant degradation by-products responsible for varnish formation. The process begins by treating the lubricant sample with a specific chemical mixture designed to isolate insoluble by-product material. Next, a separation process collects the varnish forming insoluble degradation by-products including the sub-micron species. The process concludes with Quantitative Spectrophotometric Analysis on the isolated degradation by-product. The results are reported on a scale of 1-100 and indicated the Varnish Potential Rating of the lubricant.
QSASM has been demonstrated to have a high correlation with the varnish potential of the lubricant. It is sensitive, repeatable and reliable.
QSASM is a Service Mark of Analysts Inc.
Solution
Preventing Varnish
What about switching to a better oil to reduce varnish? Oil manufacturers have developed new oils to resist varnish formation. These products are composed of an API Group II (hydro-cracked) or higher basestock. Although API Group II and III formulated lubricants outperform API Group I (solvent refined) oils in virtually all categories, the research to date is inconclusive concerning varnish prevention.
Reasons that switching to API Group II or III lubricant may not help:
1. Lower solvency means that the lubricant has a lower tolerance for degradation by-products.
2. Several antioxidants are combined in oils to maximize RPVOT and TOST values. Some inexperienced formulators use some antioxidant combinations In Group II and III products that have a high propensity to form sludge when depleted.
3. Topping off a lubrication system that has an API Group I product with an API Group II or III product often produces severe varnish problems, even if the oil is from the same manufacturer.
4. All of the laboratory research in this area has been performed by exerting oxidative stresses on the oil. Varnish is often caused by a different degradation mechanism (i.e. thermal degradation), that is not measured by the scope of current research.
Most times, varnish is an inherent problem with lubrication systems. However, it is possible to prevent varnish from forming with certain technologies that are capable of removing sub-micron particles. Clarus Technologies has examined many of the products commercially available and come up with a technology that solves varnish problems. This has been demonstrated with dozens of customer ranging from power plants, chemical factories and marine applications.
Please contact Clarus Technologies for more information.